CNN Economics Commentator Catherine Rampell shredded Kamala Harris' communist plan to institute price controls.

"We've seen this kind of thing tried in lots of other countries before, Venezuela, Argentina, the Soviet Union," Rampell said. "It leads to shortages. It leads to black markets, plenty of uncertainty."

Rampell said that Kamala's price control plan would "at best, do nothing. At worst, cause a lot of harm."

WATCH the clip here.

TRANSCRIPT

CNN: I read your piece, and I heard you just mention it, the federal ban on price gouging for groceries. You are skeptical of this. Why?

RAMPELL: Well, first of all, nobody can explain what price gouging means. It's like that old line about pornography: I know it when I see it, in the sense that, what does it mean to have an excessive price or an excessive profit margin? That seems to be shorthand for a price or a profit margin that bugs me. That seems too high.

So, you know, it's very hard to pin down what this would actually mean. If you look at the legislation that, as I mentioned, is already in the Senate, led by Senator Warren and Senator Bob Casey and a slew of others. The particular way that this is written, which is likely to be the template for any proposal that Harris would eventually embrace, is especially bad in that it just bans "excessive prices, grossly excessive prices, grossly excessive profit margins," and says that the Federal Trade Commission can use any metric it deems appropriate to decide what that would mean.

Which basically says, like, it's not going to be markets, it's not going to be supply and demand that's determining how much your grocery store charges you for for milk or for eggs. It's going to be some bureaucrat in DC.

Which seems totally unworkable, first of all, for the FTC to be deciding how much Kroger charges for eggs in Michigan. But it also would be very bad for markets. We've seen this kind of thing tried in lots of other countries before, Venezuela, Argentina, the Soviet Union, et cetera. It leads to shortages. It leads to black markets, plenty of uncertainty.

And beyond that, the specific way this bill is written might actually increase prices because of some of the other language in it, things like requiring companies, public companies, to disclose in their quarterly reports, the quarterly earnings reports, how they're setting prices, which is a great way to help them collude, which normally we don't want them to do.

So anyway, you know, the devil's in the in the details, I guess, for that bill. But it's really hard for me to imagine any form of legislation that preserves the spirit of what she's proposing that would not be, you know, at best, do nothing. At worst, cause a lot of harm.